This page presents the survey questions, along with detailed explanations for each answer and the corresponding points assigned. Our objective is to enhance clarity for both candidates and voters by elucidating why the chosen answers align most closely with consumer choice and freedom in the European Union. We aim to underscore the benefits of policies in harmony with these answers for consumers. The methodology involved a straightforward multiple-choice survey addressing key concerns for European consumers, including inflation, mobility costs, innovation, food supply sustainability, consumer freedom, harm reduction policies, digital freedom, and trade.
A
0
Points
B
5
Points
C
5
Points
D
10
Points
It is essential to consider the most effective approach to meet the 2030 EU climate goals of attaining 100% carbon-neutral energy sources. A proponent of consumer choice would acknowledge that fostering competition and embracing a free market are pivotal for ensuring abundance and affordability in consumers’ lives. Candidates who selected “A-State Subsidiaries” received no points for this question because government-owned companies tend to be less efficient, burdened by bureaucracy, and often deliver subpar products and services at higher costs. Moreover, these state-owned entities rely on taxpayer money, contributing to inefficiencies and imposing additional financial burdens on consumers through taxation.
The optimal path toward achieving 100% carbon-neutral energy sources lies in private investment. Candidates who chose “B-Private investments from European firms” or “C-Private investments from foreign countries” earned 5 points for their responses. The most commendable answer, however, is “D-Both B and C,” which garnered 10 points. This score highlights the significance of combining private investments from both European and foreign entities as the most viable strategy for realizing the ambitious climate goals by 2030.
A
10
Points
B
0
Points
C
0
Points
D
0
Points
From a consumer choice and consumer freedom perspective, it is crucial to consider the impact of policies on individuals’ purchasing power and freedom of choice. Gasoline taxes directly influence the cost of fuel, which in turn affects consumers’ ability to afford transportation and other goods and services dependent on fuel prices. Lowering gasoline taxes aligns with consumer choice principles by allowing individuals to decide based on their preferences and economic circumstances. It promotes affordability by reducing the financial burden on consumers, particularly those with lower incomes who may be disproportionately affected by higher fuel costs. Additionally, lower taxes create a competitive market environment where consumers can choose between different modes of transportation, including gasoline-powered vehicles and alternatives such as electric vehicles.
Candidates who selected “A. Lower gasoline taxes” recognize the importance of balancing environmental goals with consumer affordability and freedom of choice. Policymakers can foster a more equitable and sustainable energy transition by prioritizing measures that minimize economic strain on consumers while still advancing climate objectives.
A
5
Points
B
0
Points
C
0
Points
D
10
Points
Promoting diverse energy technologies offers individuals more options and flexibility in meeting their energy needs while maintaining affordability and sustainability.
Choosing “D. All of the above” acknowledges the importance of considering multiple pathways to achieve energy affordability and sustainability. Nuclear energy provides a reliable and low-carbon source of electricity, offering stability to the energy grid and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Hydrogen technology provides potential energy storage and transportation solutions, contributing to decarbonization efforts. Wind and solar power represent renewable energy sources that can help reduce reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate environmental impacts. By promoting these technologies, EU member states empower consumers to make informed choices based on their preferences, needs, and local conditions. This approach fosters competition and innovation in the energy sector, driving down costs and advancing technological development. Additionally, a diverse energy mix enhances energy security by reducing dependence on any single energy source or technology.
A
0
Points
B
0
Points
C
10
Points
D
0
Points
From a consumer choice and consumer freedom perspective, the primary goal of EU free trade agreements should be to enhance overall economic prosperity. Free trade agreements facilitate the exchange of goods and services between countries, fostering competition, innovation, and market efficiency, ultimately benefiting consumers by offering them a wider variety of high-quality products at competitive prices.
Selecting “C. Overall economic prosperity” recognizes the fundamental role of free trade in promoting consumer welfare and choice. By reducing trade barriers and promoting fair competition, free trade agreements enable consumers to access a broader range of goods and services, including those produced more efficiently abroad. This stimulates economic growth, job creation, and higher living standards for consumers across the EU.
A
10
Points
B
0
Points
C
5
Points
D
0
Points
The ultimate goal of EU digital policy should be to promote innovation. Innovation drives technological advancement, fosters competition, and expands consumer choice by introducing new products, services, and business models.
Selecting “A. Promoting innovation” recognizes the transformative potential of digital technologies to improve consumers’ lives and enhance economic growth. By fostering an environment conducive to innovation, EU digital policy can stimulate entrepreneurship, investment, and the development of cutting-edge technologies that benefit consumers across various sectors, including healthcare, education, and entertainment. Prioritizing innovation ensures that EU digital policy maximizes consumer welfare by driving forward technological progress and expanding the range of choices available to consumers in the digital marketplace.
A
10
Points
B
5
Points
C
0
Points
D
0
Points
Promoting novel harm-reducing technologies aligns with the goal of the EU Beating Cancer Plan by offering consumers alternative options to traditional tobacco products. These technologies, such as vaping, heat-not-burn devices, and nicotine pouches, have shown potential for reducing the harm associated with smoking by providing safer alternatives.
Selecting “A. Strongly Agree” acknowledges the importance of empowering consumers with information and choices to improve their health outcomes. By promoting harm-reducing technologies, EU member states can support smokers who wish to quit or reduce their tobacco consumption while minimizing the adverse health effects associated with smoking. Prioritizing these technologies aligns with consumer freedom by providing smokers with viable alternatives and supporting their autonomy in making informed decisions about their health.
A
0
Points
B
0
Points
C
5
Points
D
10
Points
Promoting more public funds like the EU Recovery Fund to reduce inflation may be ineffective and could potentially exacerbate inflationary pressures. Injecting large amounts of public funds into the economy can lead to increased government spending, which may fuel inflation by boosting demand without a corresponding increase in the supply of goods and services.
Selecting “D. Strongly Disagree” reflects an understanding of the potential consequences of expansive fiscal policies on inflation and consumer purchasing power. Instead of relying solely on public funds, European institutions should prioritize measures promoting price stability, such as prudent monetary policy and structural reforms to enhance productivity and competitiveness. By rejecting the promotion of additional public funds to reduce inflation, policymakers can prioritize measures that support long-term financial stability and protect consumers from the adverse effects of rising prices.
A
10
Points
B
5
Points
C
0
Points
D
0
Points
The European Union’s internal single market has played a pivotal role in promoting consumer freedom by removing trade barriers, enhancing competition, and expanding consumer choice across member states.
Selecting “A. Strongly Agree” acknowledges the transformative impact of the single market on consumer welfare. By facilitating the free movement of goods, services, capital, and people, the single market has created a more integrated and dynamic economic environment where consumers enjoy greater access to diverse products and services at competitive prices. By fostering competition and innovation, the single market has driven improvements in product quality, affordability, and consumer rights protection, thereby enhancing consumer freedom within the EU.
A
10
Points
B
5
Points
C
0
Points
D
0
Points
Open competition across member state borders should be the primary goal of an EU-unified internal single market. Removing barriers to trade and fostering a level playing field for businesses across the EU promote competition, innovation, and consumer welfare.
Selecting “A. Strongly Agree” reflects a commitment to free market competition and consumer choice. By ensuring that businesses can compete freely and fairly across borders, the EU internal single market maximizes consumer benefits by offering a more comprehensive range of goods and services at competitive prices. By promoting an environment where businesses can thrive, and consumers can access the best products and services across the EU, policymakers can strengthen consumer confidence in the single market and foster economic growth and prosperity.
A
10
Points
B
0
Points
C
5
Points
D
0
Points
Legalizing GMOs can contribute to promoting food security and affordability by enhancing agricultural productivity, increasing crop resilience to environmental stressors, and reducing production costs.
Selecting “A. Legalize GMOs” acknowledges the potential benefits of biotechnology in addressing food security challenges. GMOs have the potential to increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and reduce the need for chemical pesticides and fertilizers, thereby lowering production costs and contributing to more affordable food prices for consumers. By embracing innovation in agriculture, EU institutions can support consumer choice and promote sustainable food production practices that enhance both food security and affordability.
A
10
Points
B
0
Points
C
0
Points
D
0
Points
From a consumer choice and consumer freedom perspective, promoting and protecting intellectual property rights is essential for incentivizing innovation and ensuring timely access to life-saving medical treatments and technologies during global pandemics.
Selecting “A. Promote and protect intellectual property rights” acknowledges the critical role of intellectual property in driving medical innovation and research. Strong intellectual property protections incentivize pharmaceutical companies and researchers to invest in the development of vaccines, treatments, and diagnostic tools, which are crucial for combating emerging infectious diseases and protecting public health. By safeguarding intellectual property, the EU can ensure that innovators are rewarded for their contributions and that consumers have access to safe, effective, and innovative healthcare solutions when faced with future pandemics.
Do you need more information about our mission, the survey or the candidate ranking?
We are here to answer your questions.
You will get the latest news from candidates’ policy responses all over the EU here.
CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER | May 2, 2024
Consumer Choice Center is pleased to announce the latest results for our ongoing Consumer Champs project, an innovative initiative designed to guide voters through the complex landscape of public policy…
CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER | April 17, 2024
Our Government affairs manager, Zoltan Kesz, recently interviewed an MEP candidate from the Christian Democratic Union of Germany to understand their perspective on the future of Europe, the strategies they…
CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER | April 15, 2024
Our government affairs manager, Zoltan Kesz, interviewed a candidate from Sweden’s Pirate Party for the European Parliament. The conversation sought to understand their perspectives on the future of Europe, the strategies…
712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002
ConsumerChamps.eu provides information on European Parliament candidates’ consumer-oriented policies based on their survey responses. We do not endorse any candidate or their views. Users are encouraged to independently verify information and make informed decisions. ConsumerChamps.eu is not responsible for election outcomes or candidates’ actions.
English 
Bulgarian 
Croatian 
Czech 
Danish 
Dutch 
Estonian 
Finnish 
French 
German 
Greek 
Hungarian 
Italian 
Latvian 
Lithuanian 
Polish 
Portuguese 
Romanian 
Slovak 
Slovenian 
Spanish 
Swedish